• Should family have been forced to cover up their sexy snowlady?

    After neighbors complained, a New Jersey family was forced to cover up their Venus de Milo snow sculpture. Do you think it was necessary?

    Results with 99 short comments
    Total of 6,554 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

    92.9%
    No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.
    6,090 votes
    7.1%
    Yes. It's an inappropriate public display and should be covered up.
    464 votes
    Display Comments:
    No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

    An excellent snow woman and piece of snow art that should not have to be covered up. Christian fanatics try to ruin everything fun and good

    • 9 votes
    #1
     - Eric, Salinas, CA
     - 1:36 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
    No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

    This is pretty ridiculous but unfortunately we live in the age of entitlement.

      #2
       - Sono
       - 1:37 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
      No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

      Porn? Are you kidding me? We all need to grow up a little bit.

      • 7 votes
      #3
       - cherub rock
       - 1:39 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
      No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

      Some people are just to up tight. Your kids are going to learn about it sooner than later. If you say no they are going to go look for it

        #4
         - cath8385
         - 1:55 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        What kind of society have we become? Is the human body that shameful? You see more sexuality in the mall & that's w/ clothing on! Grow up!

        • 4 votes
        #5
         - C NJ Mom 1
         - 1:58 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        No, It's a snow statue for God's sake. Some people have really small, dirty minds.

        • 3 votes
        #6
         - Mary Robertson
         - 1:58 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        i think this lady's neighbors need to get a life, and oh yeah...mind their own business.

        • 2 votes
        #7
         - LILLIAN-1101268
         - 1:59 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        The neighbors are a pack of idiots. It wasn't overly detailed nor obscene in any way. Get over it...we are all naked under our clothes!

        • 2 votes
        #8
         - kenaiqueen
         - 2:02 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        I'm speechless. Considering this anything but well done art is down right ignorant.

        • 2 votes
        #9
         - Marshall in PA
         - 2:04 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        It was a startlingly good reproduction of one of the great works of art. Get over it, people - just 'cause you don't look like that. Jerks

        • 2 votes
        #10
         - Dave in NM
         - 2:13 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        I thought it was great - very talented family!

        • 3 votes
        #11
         - Sunbeam
         - 2:15 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        Yes. It's an inappropriate public display and should be covered up.

        The real statue has lower half covered by the artist. And, this is not even close to the real statue in design.

        • 3 votes
        #12
         - SaintGeorge
         - 2:18 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        Makes you wonder if some of these prudes EVER even get undressed.

        • 1 vote
        #13
         - Carl-825390
         - 2:30 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        Instead of covering the snow woman I would have duct taped the mouth of the person who complained!

        • 2 votes
        #14
         - veve714
         - 2:30 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        If the prudes don't like it, then don't look. It was on private property so the neighbors should "butt-out" so to speak.

        • 1 vote
        #15
         - PingLizard
         - 2:31 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        There was no detail on the snow statue that would make it inappropriate.

        • 1 vote
        #16
         - Atech
         - 2:48 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        I know that our country is very Puritanical, but for heaven's sake it's just a snow torso. These complainers had better never go to Europe

        • 1 vote
        #17
         - Ardecy
         - 2:49 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        "I know it when I see it," Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said when defining porn. I didn't "know it" when I saw this snow sculpture

        • 2 votes
        #18
         - Matt Staben
         - 2:52 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        I could see if it were "detailed" but my gosh, people need to take the stick out and unclench a bit.

        • 2 votes
        #19
         - Melanie-1631910
         - 2:57 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        It's amazing! They should be paid!

        • 1 vote
        #20
         - weasels
         - 3:13 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        There are bigger and better things to worry about in life than this! -- War, Violence, Famine. . .

        • 1 vote
        #21
         - Another Open Mind
         - 3:18 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        No way! Talk about a violation of their constitutional rights. I would have politely declined to remove or cover it.

        • 1 vote
        #22
         - Pete-894576
         - 3:30 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        So if they're at a store with a naked mannequin, are they going to complain about that too? Ludicrous!

        • 1 vote
        #23
         - Katy-393385
         - 3:44 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        What a load of crap. People need to get a life and mind their own business...

        • 1 vote
        #24
         - BillM-591689
         - 3:51 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010
        No. It's ridiculous. Their snow art was totally harmless.

        More objectionable images obtained with much less creativity are shoved down our throats every day. This was a breath of fresh air!

        • 2 votes
        #25
         - Mitchell-500777
         - 4:05 pm EST on Thu Mar 4, 2010

        "Like" TODAY Moms on Facebook, and follow us @TodayMoms